<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does refactoring mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobobobo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/what-does-refactoring-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobobobo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/what-does-refactoring-mean/</link>
	<description>technology and the internets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:40:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: legalize</title>
		<link>http://bobobobo.wordpress.com/2009/07/08/what-does-refactoring-mean/#comment-4823</link>
		<dc:creator>legalize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobobobo.wordpress.com/?p=1248#comment-4823</guid>
		<description>Rewriting code to remove bugs isn&#039;t refactoring because you&#039;ve changed what the code does.  Fixing bugs is fixing bugs, not refactoring.  Refactoring doesn&#039;t change the meaning of the code.  There are some who claim that performance improvements are not refactoring either because you&#039;ve changed the observed behavior.  I don&#039;t agree with that because the results are the same, you just got the results in a more efficient manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rewriting code to remove bugs isn&#8217;t refactoring because you&#8217;ve changed what the code does.  Fixing bugs is fixing bugs, not refactoring.  Refactoring doesn&#8217;t change the meaning of the code.  There are some who claim that performance improvements are not refactoring either because you&#8217;ve changed the observed behavior.  I don&#8217;t agree with that because the results are the same, you just got the results in a more efficient manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
